About NLP:

New Left Project is dedicated to producing high quality comment and analysis on issues of concern to the political left (broadly defined). We are not affiliated to any particular party, tendency or strand of thought. Rather, we seek to contribute towards a lively, inclusive culture of left-wing discussion, appealing both to those who already consider themselves to be of the left, and to any others who have an interest in its ideas and priorities.

Our site contains a mixture of short, timely content on our blog as well as more detailed, in-depth treatment of various subjects through our feature articles, interviews and NLP-hosted debates. We are developing more audio/visual content as the site evolves, as well as branching out into organising live events. In addition to broadening the forms of content we produce, we are always looking to expand the range of topics that NLP covers, from current affairs to theory, philosophy and culture.

We welcome unsolicited contributions, as well as comments on any of our published content. You can scroll down from here to learn more about the members of the NLP community. We hope you enjoy the site.

About New Left Project

Notes for contributors:

We welcome submissions of original material for NLP, be it comment and analysis articles, reports from activist events, or interviews with notable and interesting people. We are happy to receive material on a broad range of topics. Please check the "About NLP" section to get a sense of our general worldview and areas of interest.

We work to maintain a high-quality of output at all times. Opinion pieces should be tightly argued and backed up with citations of reliable sources wherever possible. Hyperlinks for citations are preferable, but footnotes are also fine.

In terms of word length, we are reasonably flexible, understanding that many subjects benefit from in depth discussion. We prefer pieces of 800 to 1500 words, but we may well consider longer pieces where the writing remains focused, and is the result of some in depth research or necessarily detailed argument. The longer the piece the greater the burden of proof to show that the length is required.

Any work submitted should be previously unpublished.

Contact: info[at]newleftproject.org

Comments policy:

New Left Project encourages readers to comment on our articles. Comments are moderated. The aim is to foster inclusivity, to avoid abuse of our contributors and other commentators, and to ensure that comments add something valuable and substantive to the material that is being commented upon.

We have adopted this policy to ensure that all those who wish to participate in NLP feel safe to do so, to encourage constructive debate and to avoid unnecessary aggression. Comments are moderated according to the following criteria:

Content
1: Comments must engage with the article, or at minimum other comments - irrelevant contributions will be rejected.
2: Comments must be coherent – incoherent and rambling comments will not be published. This does not mean comments have to meet academic standards; simply that they must be intelligible to other readers.
3: Criticism should be constructive in order to further the debate - overly negative, insulting or petty comments will not be published.
Tone
4: Comments must not be abusive; including deliberately attacking the contributor or other commentators, personal slights, and using excessive or unnecessary swear words.
5: Comments must be respectful of other contributors; including the author and other commentators. Language that causes offense to minority groups will not be tolerated.

Interpretation of this policy is at the discretion of the NLP editors. If we are unsure about a comment we will discuss it with the other co-editors before taking a decision. We sometimes contact people when we have concerns about their comments but we do not do so as a matter of routine. If your comment is not published and you have not heard anything, you may wish to resubmit your comment in a manner that is in line with our comments policy. We accept that some individuals may find a particular decision unsatisfactory, but we take the view that there will be more who welcome the ability to participate in fruitful and worthwhile discussion and debate.

Who we are: